Seal failure from chemical attack is typified by dull, honeycombed, flaky, crumbly or broken parts. The weight and hardness measurements of the damaged parts will be substantially reduced as compared with the original values. Such failures result from using the wrong materials of construction for the chemical environment. If double seals have been used, it’s a signal to check the reliability of the pressurizing system or the purity of the buffer fluid.
Corrective Actions include:
(1) a complete chemical analysis of the product being sealed, and upgrading the seal’s materials of construction for the environment;
(2) use of double seals to neutralize the corrosive environment or, when a single seal with a bushing or a lip seal is used in the bottom of the seal cavity, flushing the seal with a clean, compatible fluid. Chemical attack can be suspected if the O-rings are swollen or have taken a permanent set that prevents axial movement of the sliding seal face. Chemical attack can leave O-rings hardened, bubbled, blistered on the surface, or with an eroded or broken appearance. Typical causes include incorrect material selection or loss or contamination of the seal buffer fluid.
A complete chemical analysis of the liquid being sealed and reevaluation of O-ring selection should be the first steps in investigating this type of failure. Frequently, the presence of trace compounds or elements, originally overlooked when specifying the seals, will be at fault. If a suitable material can’t be found, an artificial environment must be created by flushing the seal from an external source.
Leaching normally causes a minor increase in seal leakage and a sharp increase in wear of the carbon faces. Ceramic and tungsten carbide faces that have been leached will appear dull and matted—even though no coating is present on them. Hardness readings on these seal faces will show a decrease of 5 points or more, on the Rockwell A scale.
Leaching results from chemical attack on the binder in powdered-metal and ceramic materials. This can occur from a few ten thousandths to several thousandths of an inch deep, and leave the seal parts beyond repair. For example, caustic solutions such as those found in water treatment processes, as well as hydrofluoric acid solutions, will leach 5% or more of the free-silicon binders in ceramic seal rings. This will cause excessive wear on the carbon-graphite seal face and further abrasive damage between the seal faces, resulting in very short seal life.
Coking leaves a varnish, lacquer or abrasive sludge on the atmospheric side of the seal. This can cause rapid wear of the seal faces and/or hang-up of both pusher and non-pusher seals.
Coking is caused by the oxidation or chemical decomposition of hydrocarbons and resultant formation of heavy residues. These corrective actions can prevent recurrence:
1. Applying a steam purge to the atmospheric side of pusher and non-pusher mechanical seals to carry away sludge or abrasive debris.
2. Flushing the seal from a clean, cool external source to eliminate coking in the seal cavity.
3. Cooling the seal cavity by using a stuffing-box water jacket, or a water-cooled or air-cooled heat exchanger.
4. Switching from carbon-graphite to ceramic, hard seal face materials that withstand the abrasive action of particles formed by oxidation and purge the seal on the atmospheric side with steam to remove sludge and debris.
In general, hydrocarbons should be cooled to below 250° F (121° C) in the seal cavity to prevent oxidation and coking. This temperature limit depends greatly on the fluid being handled. For example, oxidation limits for heat-transfer fluids are above 350° F (177° C).
Shaanxi DaoLin Mechanical & Electrical Co.,Ltd
Room1107, Building B, Sail Times Plaza, Hou Wei Zhai, Wei Yang
District, 710085, Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, China
Tel.:+86(029)84523807-802 Fax: +86(029)84523807-808